PERFORMS EQA Evidence

The evaluation of artificial intelligence in mammography-based breast cancer screening: Is breast-level analysis enough?

European Radiology
Taib A, Partridge G, Yao L, Darker I, Chen Y

Keeping AI on Track: Regular monitoring of algorithmic updates in mammography

European Journal of Radiology
Taib A, James J, Partridge G, Chen Y

Breast imaging readers’ performance in the PERFORMS test-set based assessment scheme within the MyPeBS international randomised study

European Journal of Radiology
Michalopoulou E, Darker I, Iotti V, Slonim E, DE Koning H, et al.

A comparison of breast screening performance based on a standardised test, during and outside of the COVID-19 lockdown period

European Journal of Radiology
Michalopoulou E, Pugalenthi P, Darker I, Chen Y

Performance of a Breast Cancer Detection AI Algorithm Using the Personal Performance in Mammographic Screening Scheme

Radiology, 308(3), doi:/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00104-3
Yan Chen, Adnan G. Taib, Iain T. Darker, Jonathan J. James

Performance of radiologists and radiographers in double reading mammograms: the UK breast screening programme.

Radiology
Chen Y, James J, Michalopoulou E, Darker I, Jenkins J.

The relationship between missed breast cancers on mammography in a test-set based assessment scheme and real-life performance in a National Breast Screening Programme

European Journal of Radiology, 142:109881, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109881
Yan Chen, Jonathan J James, Eleni Michalopoulou, Iain T Darker, Jacquie Jenkins

The relationship between mammography readers real-life performance and performance in a test-set based assessment scheme in a national breast screening programme

Further analysis using Bland-Altman plots (in press)
Chen Y., James J.J., Cornford E.J. & Jenkins J

Role of vacuum assisted excision in minimising overtreatment of ductal atypias.

European Journal of Radiology, PMID: 32919262
McMahon M.A., Haigh I., Chen Y., Millican-Slater R.A., Sharma N.

A review of the PERFORMS scheme in breast screening

The British journal of Radiology, 93:1112
Gale A.G. & Chen Y.

Relationship Between Mammography Readers Real-life Performance and Performance in a Test-set Based Assessment Scheme in a National Breast Screening Programme

Radiology: Imaging Cancer, 2(5):e200016
Chen Y., James J.J., Cornford E.J. & Jenkins J

Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography

Clinical Radiology 73:886-892
James JJ, Giannotti E, Chen Y

Computer aided diagnosis in mammography

In Mould R.F. (Ed.). Computers in Radiotherapy and Oncology (Bristol) Adam Hilger
Gale A.G., Howe E., Roebuck E.J. & Worthington B.S.

Computer aided diagnosis in mammography

In Lemke H.U., Rhodes M.L., Jaffe C.C. & Felix R. (Eds.). Computer Assisted Radiology (Berlin) Springer
Gale A.G., Roebuck E.J., Riley P.J. & Worthington B.S.

Mammography and computer assisted diagnosis

British Journal of Radiology, 59(704)
Gale A.G., Roebuck E.J. & Worthington B.S.

Computer assisted mammography in clinical practice: another set of problems to solve

Radiology, 161(29)
Gale A.G., Roebuck E.J. & Worthington B.S.

Computer Assisted Mammographic Diagnosis

British Journal of Radiology,59(702)
Gale A.G., Sole K., Roebuck E.J. & Worthington B.S.

Computer aids to mammography diagnosis

British Journal of Radiology, 60:887-891
Gale A.G., Roebuck E.J., Riley P. & Worthington B.S.

Training for mammography screening programmes

Diagnostic Imaging, 9:187-193
Gale A.G.

Training in mammographic interpretation

British Journal of Radiology, 60(814)
Gale A.G., Downey S.E., Roebuck E.J. & Worthington B.S.